<html dir="ltr"><head></head><body style="text-align:left; direction:ltr;"><div>On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 16:12 -0500, Tom Henderson wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex">I suggest that "tech" writer or "technical" writer gets far more
and pertinent hits, this from anecdotal experience. The phrase
"technology writer" is a bit too obtuse for the simplistic mind of
their keyword match.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>When I try that I get ads for manual and documentation jobs, neither of which interest me.</div><div><br></div><div>Networking remains the only real way I ever find work.</div><div><br></div><div>Steven</div><div><span><pre>-- <br></pre><div style="width: 71ch;">Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols</div><div style="width: 71ch;">CBS/ZDNet, Contributing Editor: <a href="http://goo.gl/FkYasd">http://goo.gl/FkYasd</a></div><div style="width: 71ch;">ComputerWorld, Columnist: <a href="http://goo.gl/c02Km0">http://goo.gl/c02Km0</a></div><div style="width: 71ch;">QOTD: "Bad things don’t happen to writers; it’s all material."</div><div style="width: 71ch;">— Garrison Keillor</div><div style="width: 71ch;"><br></div><div style="width: 71ch;"><br></div><div style="width: 71ch;"><br></div><div style="width: 71ch;"><br></div><div style="width: 71ch;"><br></div><div style="width: 71ch;"><br></div><div style="width: 71ch;"><br></div><div style="width: 71ch;"><br></div><div style="width: 71ch;"><br></div></span></div></body></html>