<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>They’re not as bad as they used to be – the programs can open a lot of different formats now. Many years ago, I had an argument with the Word product manager, who could not comprehend why anyone would need to work with anything but the old binary .doc format. WordPerfect, OTOH, could use well over a dozen file format at the time. And I soooo miss Reveal Codes!<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b>From:</b> Ipg-smz <ipg-smz-bounces@netpress.org> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Scott Mace<br><b>Sent:</b> Monday, June 24, 2019 6:10 PM<br><b>To:</b> ipg-smz@netpress.org<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Ipg-smz] No Slack for you! Microsoft puts rival app o n internal list of ‘prohibited and discouraged’ software – GeekWire<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Throughout the years, the Microsoft Office group has steadfastly refused to adequately open up its data formats, nor embrace other formats.<br><br>Scott Mace<br><br>At 12:53 PM 6/24/2019, Gabe Goldberg wrote:<br><br><br><o:p></o:p></p><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><p class=MsoNormal>The new banned list at Microsoft is a bit surprising given that part of CEO Satya Nadella’s successful strategy for reviving the software giant <a href="https://click.newsletters.fortune.com/?qs=d7dbcf64e89ab66842dc6310e44cebee15d3cb7ac153cbb0d4fb6c02cb507603c6c3523d6458c109a01002afa0571ef5042990d052b84c24">has been to embrace other platforms</a> and abandon the only-made-here mindset. At the very least, deeply knowing the competition would help ensure Microsoft’s own products keep pace. Historically, that may have been part of the problem behind what Bill Gates just called “one of the greatest mistakes of all time.†Appearing at an event at VC firm Village Global last week, Gates <a href="https://click.newsletters.fortune.com/?qs=d7dbcf64e89ab668dafd3d489133836e624ff0123d1a917d3f1df76f9413836edd0dfb7f3151f2e62c1fc478ddddaf50e933c58916b63fcc">admitted he made that all-time whopper </a>by failing to create the mobile operating system alternative to Apple’s iOS. Instead, Google, where co-founder Sergey Brin <a href="https://click.newsletters.fortune.com/?qs=d7dbcf64e89ab66861ae044c902132f70cbdd48269d73372b309eb6fb1f29b20b3f12230d821ed60a66378acaf4662139d4e3f476fcf4bb0">was an early fan and avid user of the iPhone</a>, grabbed the other spot. Gates called it a $400 billion mistake.<br><br>Hopefully, history won’t repeat, despite the bans.<o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div></body></html>