[Ipg-smz] Asymmetrical Mergers

[Dan Rosenbaum]

It sounds to me like you’re describing a classic leveraged buyout, where a smaller company uses a bigger company’s assets or cash to buy it. The classic case was RJR Nabisco.

 

d

 

From: Ipg-smz <ipg-smz-bounces at netpress.org> on behalf of "Perlow, Jason via Ipg-smz" <ipg-smz at netpress.org>
Reply-To: <ipg-smz at netpress.org>
Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 at 3:28 PM
To: IPG List <ipg-smz at netpress.org>
Cc: Jason Perlow <jperlow at gmail.com>
Subject: [Ipg-smz] Asymmetrical Mergers

 

Does anyone know, historically, of a merger between two companies where the valuation was highly asymmetrical? Such as when you might have a company that is worth $1000B, but wants to merge with a company that is worth $100B? They don't have the assets to buy it outright, but it would be a beneficial marriage.

 

I am going by this list and I cannot find any that are comparable.

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_mergers_and_acquisitions

 

-- 

JASON PERLOW

Sr. Technology Editor, ZDNet

Voice/Text (561)510-0063
jperlow at gmail.com
ZDNet Tech Broiler: www.techbroiler.com

Socialize Me: Twitter | Instagram | FaceBook | LinkedIn | 

 

-- Ipg-smz mailing list Ipg-smz at netpress.org http://netpress.org/mailman/listinfo/ipg-smz_netpress.org 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://netpress.org/pipermail/ipg-smz_netpress.org/attachments/20191022/30b9eab6/attachment.html>