[Ipg-smz] When the client doesn't sign the check

[Pam Baker]

Yep, they're broke and playing games.



On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:10 PM Joe Stanganelli <rodeojoe at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Client over a month late paying a not-insignificant payment (at least, not
> insignificant to me). I point this out to their AP. AP nitwit asks me for a
> current address, claiming that the check was sent back to them.
>
> I give them correct address. AP nitwit says they'll overnight it.
>
> Next day arrives. They haven't sent it yet and it's near EOB. I point this
> out. AP nitwit says they meant they would overnight it THAT day.
>
> Check arrives next day. I go to bank. Bank teller politely points out that
> he can't do anything with it because the check is unsigned.
>
> (Why am I not on direct deposit, you ask? Because I filled the ACH forms
> out and they lost the forms multiple times.)
>
> Thinking about shorting their stock. SMH.
>
> --
> Ipg-smz mailing list
> Ipg-smz at netpress.org
> http://netpress.org/mailman/listinfo/ipg-smz_netpress.org
>


-- 
Pam Baker
Freelance Journalist
email: bakercom1 at gmail.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/bakercom1
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pambaker
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://netpress.org/pipermail/ipg-smz_netpress.org/attachments/20181114/754522d5/attachment-0001.html>