[Ipg-smz] When the client doesn't sign the check

[Steve Wexler]

Check is in the mail; unsigned check; lost forms: I would be very leery of
continuing to work to work for this client.
And once the overdue payment is resolved, progress billing, or
payment/deposit with contract would be a good way to go forward.

On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 12:10, Joe Stanganelli <rodeojoe at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Client over a month late paying a not-insignificant payment (at least, not
> insignificant to me). I point this out to their AP. AP nitwit asks me for a
> current address, claiming that the check was sent back to them.
>
> I give them correct address. AP nitwit says they'll overnight it.
>
> Next day arrives. They haven't sent it yet and it's near EOB. I point this
> out. AP nitwit says they meant they would overnight it THAT day.
>
> Check arrives next day. I go to bank. Bank teller politely points out that
> he can't do anything with it because the check is unsigned.
>
> (Why am I not on direct deposit, you ask? Because I filled the ACH forms
> out and they lost the forms multiple times.)
>
> Thinking about shorting their stock. SMH.
>
> --
> Ipg-smz mailing list
> Ipg-smz at netpress.org
> http://netpress.org/mailman/listinfo/ipg-smz_netpress.org
>


-- 
Steve Wexler
Wordslingers Ink
416-282-0091
stevewexler.wordslingers at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://netpress.org/pipermail/ipg-smz_netpress.org/attachments/20181114/40feae4b/attachment.html>