[Ipg-smz] New Job Question: Trial Period to Full Time Staffer

Fri Nov 1 17:34:32 UTC 2019

>Good luck, Liam. What they’re asking for is essentially an option… and
options aren’t free.

Exactly. Your contract rate during the evaluation period should be higher
... and then you have a choice to make.

--heusser

On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 1:09 PM Liam Kelly via Ipg-smz <ipg-smz at netpress.org>
wrote:

> The naive point is the real kicker. I spoke with the editor yesterday and
> explained my irks. He quickly acquiesced and explained that I could all my
> clients until a contract was on the table.
>
> He added that he hadn't thought of it like that. I now suspect he has
> never been a freelancer...
>
> So, hopefully, I'll some lovely news to report within a month. Fingers
> crossed.
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019, 17:54 Mitch Wagner <mitch at mitchwagner.com> wrote:
>
>> Rich phrases this very well.
>>
>> They're asking for something above and beyond a normal freelance
>> relationship. You'll be taking an immediate hit from loss of that month's
>> income. And you're risking a bigger hit from a permanent loss of external
>> clients.
>>
>>
>> The immediate hit can be fixed by means of the one client paying you a
>> monthly rate equivalent to what ALL your existing clients pay. However, in
>> today's market, I doubt any editorial client would be willing to do that.
>>
>>
>> And the long-term hit may be unresolvable by any means other than
>> full-time employment.
>>
>>
>> The editor at the crypto/blockchain publication may simply be naive, in
>> which case a conversation might result in a fair agreement. OTOH, he may be
>> a jerk, in which case, well, I guess you're better off knowing that sooner
>> rather than later. :)
>>
>>
>> FWIW, when I was freelancing, whenever I heard, "We can pay you X for
>> this project but if it works out we'll have LOTS of work for you in the
>> future," I always ignored the promise of potential future work, and just
>> looked at whether the individiual project is worthwhile.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Mitch Wagner <http://mitchwagner.com/about/>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 9:04 AM Richard Santalesa via Ipg-smz <
>> ipg-smz at netpress.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Good luck, Liam. What they’re asking for is essentially an option… and
>>> options aren’t free. Everyone pays for those in every other course of
>>> business and life… so they shouldn’t get it for free, especially since it’s
>>> 100% asymmetrical… they putatively get any benefit and you get nothing
>>> above and beyond what you would get anyway… a job…. If you got extra cash
>>> then they’re be “consideration” on each side, but otherwise, frankly, it’s
>>> not even a contract IMHO.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And seconding Joe’s point, there’s no cognizable damages to them from
>>> your “breach” and so nothing a court could realistically address…
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Richard Santalesa, Esq.* CIPP-US *
>>>
>>>
>>> *O: (203) 292-0667 M: (917) 345-8675    *
>>> rsantalesa at smartedgelawgroup.com
>>> ** Admitted in NY, CT & DC*
>>>
>>>
>>> *IMPORTANT NOTICE -- ATTORNEY-CLIENT & WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES. *The
>>> information in this email (and any attachments hereto) is confidential and
>>> may be protected by legal privileges and work product immunities.  If you
>>> are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or
>>> disseminate the information. Receipt by those other than the intended
>>> recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client or work product
>>> privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
>>> notify me by replying to this email and please permanently delete the
>>> original and any copies or printouts. Although this email and attachments,
>>> if any, are believed to be free of any virus or other malware that might
>>> affect any computer system which receives it, it is the responsibility of
>>> the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is
>>> accepted by the author of the e-mail., the SmartedgeLaw Group, Smartedge
>>> LLC,  or subsidiaries or affiliates either jointly or severally, for any
>>> loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Ipg-smz [mailto:ipg-smz-bounces at netpress.org] *On Behalf Of *Liam
>>> Kelly via Ipg-smz
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 31, 2019 12:22 PM
>>> *To:* ipg-smz at netpress.org
>>> *Cc:* Liam Kelly
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Ipg-smz] New Job Question: Trial Period to Full Time
>>> Staffer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks all for the suggestions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Looks like I'll take a firmer stance (Beyonce/Fuck 'em position) despite
>>> how attractive the full time position appears.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Writers with teeth certainly eat better than those without.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019, 16:55 Todd R. Weiss via Ipg-smz <
>>> ipg-smz at netpress.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm with Joe.
>>>
>>> When they finally hire you and you know it is going to work out for YOU,
>>> that's when you can stop writing for others.
>>>
>>> Unless these guys want to pay you what you would have made in a month to
>>> make up for your lost revenue, why should you lose the revenue?
>>>
>>> If they don't know your work and your writing now, what's a month with
>>> no freelance work going to tell them?
>>>
>>> After several layoffs over the years, sometimes one just has to look out
>>> for one's self.
>>>
>>> No one else appears to be looking out for any of us nowadays.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Good luck, man.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Todd :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Todd R. Weiss
>>>
>>> Technology Journalist
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Contributor:
>>>
>>> www.ChannelFutures.com <http://www.channelfutures.com/>
>>>
>>> www.ChannelPartnersOnline.com
>>>
>>> www.eWEEK.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Formerly with eWEEK.com and Computerworld.com*
>>>
>>> TechManTalking
>>>
>>> 717-806-5932 office
>>> 717-413-9630 cell
>>>
>>> toddrweiss at gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:47 AM Joe Stanganelli via Ipg-smz <
>>> ipg-smz at netpress.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> It sounds like you’ve answered your own question. You’re being asked to
>>> take enormous risk.
>>>
>>> Absent some form of legal agreement (whether in the form of an official
>>> contract, or in the form of some email back and forth indicating such an
>>> agreement or that your trial period is expressly contingent on such an
>>> agreement), what the trial-period folks don’t know can’t hurt ‘em.
>>>
>>> And, from a beyond-legal standpoint: If you “violate” this editor’s
>>> expectations and continue writing willy-nilly for all your other clients
>>> while still engaging in the “trial period”, what’s the worst that they are
>>> going to do to you? What are their enumerable damages? Are they going to
>>> sue you or send you a bill? What will their claim be? These are real
>>> questions to consider. And if the answer is “They’re not gonna do
>>> jackshit”, then that kind of answers the bigger question, now, don’t it?
>>>
>>> The “trial period” nonsense has long been a way for writing clients to
>>> screw over freelance writers in varying shapes and forms. t seems like you
>>> have little incentive to abide by the requested forbearance.
>>>
>>>
>>> tl;dr: Fuck ‘em.
>>>
>>>  *From:* Ipg-smz <ipg-smz-bounces at netpress.org> on behalf of Liam Kelly
>>> via Ipg-smz <ipg-smz at netpress.org>
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 31, 2019 11:13:37 AM
>>> *To:* ipg-smz at netpress.org <ipg-smz at netpress.org>
>>> *Cc:* Liam Kelly <ljkelly1888 at gmail.com>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Ipg-smz] New Job Question: Trial Period to Full Time
>>> Staffer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It would be tricky. I doubt that I would still have a job there after a
>>> month of not working.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm just imagining the situation in which I tell the vendors that I
>>> can't work there anymore because conflict-of-interest stuff, and then a
>>> month later come back looking for my old job.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019, 16:08 Sharon Fisher via Ipg-smz <
>>> ipg-smz at netpress.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you compromise? Can you agree to not write for vendors during the
>>> trial period?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019, 8:59 AM Liam Kelly via Ipg-smz <
>>> ipg-smz at netpress.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ah yes, how could I forget!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 3:55 PM Mitch Wagner <mitch at mitchwagner.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Seems to me that Beyonce has the best advice here:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4m1EFMoRFvY
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Mitch Wagner <http://mitchwagner.com/about/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 7:42 AM Joe Stanganelli via Ipg-smz <
>>> ipg-smz at netpress.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> (IAAL, but this is NOT legal advice. This is “If I was in this
>>> situation, here’s what I would do.” I am not your lawyer; you are not my
>>> client. I owe you no duties and I am not to be trusted.)
>>>
>>> If the editor has merely said “stop writing for these other pubs” but
>>> there is not an actual agreement to stop writing for these pubs, fuck ‘em.
>>> Say nothing and write for whomever you want. You are still freelance.
>>>
>>> If they are asking you to agree to stop writing for other pubs, tell
>>> them to go fuck themselves because that’s not how the world works.
>>>
>>> And, either way, I’d be seriously suspicious of doing any business with
>>> these fuckwads moving forward.
>>>
>>> I am in a similar situation with a long-time client whose new-ish editor
>>> has expressed the expectation that I tell him if I’m writing for other
>>> security sites and that I’m not supposed to. I said nothing because I was
>>> so stunned to hear such bullshit. And I write for whomever I want.
>>>
>>> tl;dr: Fuck these fucks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From:* Ipg-smz <ipg-smz-bounces at netpress.org> on behalf of Liam Kelly
>>> via Ipg-smz <ipg-smz at netpress.org>
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 31, 2019 10:12:01 AM
>>> *To:* ipg-smz at netpress.org <ipg-smz at netpress.org>
>>> *Cc:* Liam Kelly <ljkelly1888 at gmail.com>
>>> *Subject:* [Ipg-smz] New Job Question: Trial Period to Full Time Staffer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I've been speaking with a crypto/blockchain publication this week about
>>> coming on board to help with their coverage. I will be paid on a per
>>> article basis during a one month "trial period," after which, if all goes
>>> well, I'll be offered a full-time position.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now, I also write copy for some crypto/blockchain companies at current.
>>> One company is a startup in the space, whereas the other is a PR firm that
>>> represents other crypto companies (among other subjects).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The editor has stated that I need to stop writing for these companies
>>> before beginning the trial period. I understand his reasoning (i.e.
>>> conflict of interest), but it seems risky.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What happens if I cut ties with a chunk of high paying work only to see
>>> the full-time staff position get passed on to someone else? I should add
>>> that the staff position will likely make up for the loss of marketing work
>>> financially, and I have no problem dropping the latter once I've signed a
>>> contract to work full-time for this publication.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It is indeed tricky, and I thought members of the group would have some
>>> good ideas/counter-proposals. What's a win-win for all parties in this
>>> situation?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Liam
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ipg-smz mailing list
>>> Ipg-smz at netpress.org
>>> http://netpress.org/mailman/listinfo/ipg-smz_netpress.org
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ipg-smz mailing list
>>> Ipg-smz at netpress.org
>>> http://netpress.org/mailman/listinfo/ipg-smz_netpress.org
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ipg-smz mailing list
>>> Ipg-smz at netpress.org
>>> http://netpress.org/mailman/listinfo/ipg-smz_netpress.org
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ipg-smz mailing list
>>> Ipg-smz at netpress.org
>>> http://netpress.org/mailman/listinfo/ipg-smz_netpress.org
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ipg-smz mailing list
>>> Ipg-smz at netpress.org
>>> http://netpress.org/mailman/listinfo/ipg-smz_netpress.org
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ipg-smz mailing list
>>> Ipg-smz at netpress.org
>>> http://netpress.org/mailman/listinfo/ipg-smz_netpress.org
>>>
>> --
> Ipg-smz mailing list
> Ipg-smz at netpress.org
> http://netpress.org/mailman/listinfo/ipg-smz_netpress.org
>

-- 
Matthew Heusser,
Managing Director, Excelon Development
http://www.xndev.com

Save The Scrum! http://www.leanpub.com/SaveOurScrum
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://netpress.org/pipermail/ipg-smz_netpress.org/attachments/20191101/189c5109/attachment-0001.html>